Using Student Choice for Engaged Learning in Sport, Tourism, Recreation, and Live Entertainment Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/27316Keywords:
student choice, learning autonomy, engaged learning, higher education, college teaching, sport management education, Curricular Innovation for Sport ManagementAbstract
Fostering engaged learning in higher education contributes to students’ lifelong learning. Additionally, engaged learning prepares graduates to transfer their learning to the workplace, which is particularly important in pre-professional sport, tourism, recreation, and live entertainment (STRLE) programs. Engaged learning entails students actively and intentionally participating in their own learning, and learning autonomy is fundamental to their ownership of the learning enterprise. Student choice can be implemented as an engaged learning pedagogy by supporting student autonomy. Offering students choices in the classroom can increase engagement, enjoyment, and motivation; build competence and higher order thinking skills; and improve student success. Faculty engaged in this praxis in a sport management program at a small, private college. To further enhance student success, STRLE faculty can implement student choice following the recommended best practices. Offering choices that align with student interests and values, and provide connection and competence, best support autonomy. Faculty should also demonstrate warmth, flexibility, and consistency to increase the effectiveness of providing student choices. This commentary explores the literature on student choice as an engaged learning practice, illustrates a practice example, and makes recommendations for effectively applying student choice in the STRLE classroom.
References
Agbuga, B., Ping Xiang, McBride, R. E., & Xiaoxia Su. (2016). Student perceptions of instructional choices in middle school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,
(2), 138–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2015-0010
Aitken, A. A., Graham, S., & McNeish, D. (2022). The effects of choice versus preference on
writing and the mediating role of perceived competence. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 114(8), 1844–1865. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000765
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy
enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in
schoolwork. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278.
https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883
Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the
longer term, Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309
Boulton, C. A., Hughes, E., Kent, C., Smith, J. R., & Williams, H. T. P. (2019). Student engagement
and wellbeing over time at a higher education institution. PloS One, 14(11), e0225770.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225770
Braunstein-Minkove, J. R., & DeLuca, J. R. (2015). Effectively adapting the sport management
curricula: harnessing internal and external resources to address industry-specific needs.
Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 30(2), 12.
Brooks, C. F., & Young, S. L. (2011). Are choice-making opportunities needed in the classroom?
Using Self-Determination Theory to consider student motivation and learner
empowerment. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 23(1),
–59.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.
New York: Plenum.
Dobrow, S. R., Smith, W.K., Posner, M. (2011). Managing the grading paradox: Leveraging the
power of choice in the classroom. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(2), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.10.2.zqr261
Furtak, E. M., & Kunter, M. (2012). Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning
and motivation. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 284–316.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.573019
Garside, J. Nhemachena, J. Williams, J. & Topping, A. (2009). Repositioning assessment: Giving
students the “choice” of assessment methods. Nurse Education in Practice, 9(2), 141-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2008.09.003
Gikandi, J. W. (2019). Promoting competence-based learning and assessment through
innovative use of electronic portfolios. In J. Keengwe & R. Byamukama (Eds.), Handbook
of Research on Promoting Higher-Order Skills and Global Competencies in Life and
Work (pp. 181-208). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6331-0.ch012
Gustavsson, P., Jirwe, M., Aurell, J., Miller, E., & Rudman, A. (2016). Autonomy-supportive
interventions in schools: A review. Report number B2016: B3. Karolinska Institute.
Hanewicz, C., Platt, A., & Arendt, A. (2017). Creating a learner-centered teaching environment using student choice in assignments. Distance Education, 38(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369349
Harnish, R., McElwee R., Slattery, J., Frantz, S., Haney, M., Shore, C., & Penley, J. (2011).
Creating the foundation for a warm classroom climate: Best practices in syllabus tone.
Observer, 24(1). Retrieved from
http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2011/january-
/creating-the-foundation-for-a-warm-classroom-climate.html
Hirve, S., & Neelam, N. (2022). Role of academic autonomy in achieving optimal learning
environment: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Early Childhood
Special Education, 14(4), 2665–2677. https://doi.org/10.9756/INTJECSE/V14I4.366
Iyengar, S. S. & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of
a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995-1006.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
Iyengar, S., Huberman, G., & Jiang, W. (2004). How much choice is too much? Contributions to
(k) retirement plans. In O. S. Mitchell & S. P. Utkus (Eds.), Pension design and
structure: New lessons from behavioral finance (pp. 83–97). Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, R. & O’Neill, K. (2018). Teaching required courses: Pedagogy under duress. Pedagogy,
(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-4216914
Katz, I. and Assor, A. (2006) When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational
Psychology Review, 19(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y
Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Hays, E. R. and Ivey, M. J. 1991. College teacher misbehaviors: What
students don't like about what teachers say and do. Communication Quarterly, 39, 309-
https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379109369808
Lochbaum, M., & Jean-Noel, J. (2016). Perceived autonomy-support instruction and student
outcomes in physical education and leisure-time: A meta-analytic review of correlates.
RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Del Deporte, 12(43), 29–47.
https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2016.04302
Manning, R. D., Keiper, M. C., & Jenny, S. E. (2017). Pedagogical innovations for the Millennial
sport management student: Socrative and Twitter. Sport Management Education
Journal (Human Kinetics), 11(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2016-0014
McMurtrie, B. (2022, April 5). A ‘stunning’ level of student disconnection. The Chronicle of
Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/a-stunning-level-of-student-
disconnection?cid=gen_sign_in
Moore, J. L. (2021). Key practices for fostering engaged learning. Change, 53(6), 12–18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2021.1987787
Moore, J.L. (2023). Key practices for fostering engaged learning: A guide for faculty and staff.
Stylus Publishing.
O’Hallarn, B. & Strode, J. (2020). #ODU2ODU: Testing the benefits of a partnership between
sport management classrooms. Sports Innovation Journal, 1, 18-35.
https://doi.org/10.18060/23830
Patall, E. A. (2019, May). Taking stock of teacher autonomy support and control. Invited keynote
given at the 7th International Conference on Self-Determination Theory, Egmond aan
Zee (Amsterdam), The Netherlands.
Patall, E.A., Cooper, H. and Robinson, J.G. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation
and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings, Psychological Bulletin,
(2), 270-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of
providing choices in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896–915.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019545
Patall, E.A., Dent, A.L., Oyer, M. and Wynn, S.R. (2013) Student autonomy and course value: the
unique and cumulative roles of various teacher practices. Motivation and Emotion, 37,
, 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9305-6
Pretorius, L., van Mourik, G. P., & Barratt, C. (2017). Student choice and higher-order thinking:
Using a novel flexible assessment regime combined with critical thinking activities to
encourage the development of higher order thinking. International Journal of Teaching
& Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 389–401.
Race, P. Smith, B. & Brown, S. (2005). 500 tips on assessment. Routledge-Falmer, London. (2nd
ed.).
Reeve, J. and Hyeon Cheon, S. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits,
and potential to improve educational practice, Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54-77.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657
Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and the self in
psychological development. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation,
Vol. 40: Developmental perspectives on motivation. University of Nebraska Press.
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic
motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in
the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership.
Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2
Teixeira, P. J., Marques, M. M., Silva, M. N., Brunet, J., Duda, J. L., Haerens, L., La Guardia, J.,
Lindwall, M., Lonsdale, C., Markland, D., Michie, S., Moller, A. C., Ntoumanis, N., Patrick,
H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., Sebire, S. J., Standage, M., Vansteenkiste, M., … Hagger, M. S.
(2020). Classification of techniques used in self-determination theory-based
interventions in health contexts: An expert consensus study. Motivation Science, 6(4),
–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000172
Thompson, M. and Beymer, P. (2015). The effects of choice in the classroom: Is there too little
or too much choice? Support for Learning, 2, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-
12086
Van den Berghe, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Cardon, G., Kirk, D., & Haerens, L. (2014). Research on
self-determination in physical education: Key findings and proposals for future research.
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1080
Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P. D., Hilland, T., Cinelli, R., Owen, K. B., Kapsal, N., Lee, J., Antczak, D.,
Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Lonsdale, C. (2020). Self-determination theory applied in
physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 112(7), 1444–1469. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000420
Waldeck, J. H. (2006). Raising the question #3: What does “personalized education” mean for
faculty and how should it serve our students. Communication Education, 55, 345-352.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600748649
Willison, J. (2020). The models of engaged learning and teaching. [electronic resource]:
Connecting sophisticated thinking from early childhood to PhD. Springer
Singapore.
Zimmer, W. K., & Keiper, P. (2021). Redesigning curriculum at the higher education level:
challenges and successes within a sport management program. Educational Action
Research, 29(2), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1727348
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anne DeMartini, Jillian McNiff-Villemaire
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright to articles published in Sport Innovation Journal is retained by the author(s).
