University Engagement with the Community through Physical Activity Opportunities
Lessons Learned from a Community Charter Guaranteeing Access to the University Health & Recreation Complex
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/28059Abstract
“Engaging marginalized members of the Community” became the mantra of the senior administration at the University as part of the appeal to various levels of government for financial support for university expansion to build the Health and RecPlex, a fieldhouse with fitness facilities, a gymnasium, several multipurpose rooms, and some research space.
This research was an exploration of current university engagement with the community through sport and physical activity to understand how well a charter, to enshrine community access, addressed some of the issues related to marginalized groups living in the inner-city. Clarke’s Situational Analysis (2017) was used to deconstruct the interview transcripts, code, and develop themes, to put forth thick and rich descriptions of the outcomes from the implementation of the charter. Universities recognize they have a civic responsibility to engage and enrich the community in which they reside. This community engagement project was intended to address significant recreational needs within the community while also furthering academic initiatives. Some suggestions for potential improvement are highlighted.
References
Allahwala, A., Bunce, S., Beagrie, L., Brail, S., Hawthorne, T., Levesque, S., Mahs, J., & Visano, B. (2013). Building and sustaining community-University partnerships in marginalized urban areas. Journal of Geography, 112(2), 43-57.
Barnett, R. (2007). Recovering the civic university. In L. McIlraith and I. M. Labhrainn (Eds.), Higher education and civic engagement: International perspectives. (pp. 25-36). Routledge.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Boyer, E. L. (1996a). From scholarship reconsidered to scholarship assessed. Quest, 48(2), 129–139.
Boyer, E. L. (1996b). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 18–33.
Bruning, S. D., McGrew, S., & Cooper, M. (2006). Town-gown relationships: Exploring university-community engagement from the perspective of community members. Public Relations Review, 32, 125-130.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2006). Community engagement classification. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
Casson, N. J., Contosta, A. R., Burakowski, E. A., Campbell, J. L., Crandall, M. S., Creed, I. F., Eimers, M. C., Garlick, S., Lutz, D. A., Morison, M. Q., Morzillo A. T., & Nelson S. J. (2019). Winter weather whiplash: Impacts of meteorological events misaligned with natural and human systems in seasonally snow‐covered regions. Earth’s Future, 7(12), 1434-1450.
Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. S. (2017). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the interpretive turn (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Clifford, D., & Petrescu, C. (2012). The keys to university-community engagement sustainability. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 23(1), 77-91.
Cohen, J., & Yapa, L. (2003). Introduction: What is public scholarship? In J. Cohen and L. Yapa (Eds.), Blueprint for public scholarship at Penn State (pp. 5-7). The Pennsylvania State University.
Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Hall, N. (2022). University-community engagement from the perspective of the university populace: A case study of a Canadian university. Metropolitan Universities, 33(1), 03-26. DOI: 10.18060/25259
Hart, A., & Northmore, S. R. (2011). Auditing and evaluating university-community engagement: Lessons from a UK study. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 34-58.
Hart, A., Northmore, S., and Gerhardt, C. (2009). Briefing paper: Auditing, benchmarking and evaluating public engagement. National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
Holland, P. & Ramaley, J. (2008). Creating a Supportive Environment for Community-University Engagement: Conceptual Frameworks, In Engaging Communities, Proceedings of the 31st HERDSA Annual Conference, Rotorua, 11-25.
Jackson, E. (2008). The CUE factor: Community-university engagement for social innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review. https://timreview.ca/node/189.
Jacobs, J. M., Castañeda, A., & Castañeda, R. (2016). Sport-based youth and community development: Beyond the ball in Chicago. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 87(5), 18-22.
Mackenzie, L. (2022). Public relations responsiveness during crime spikes: How and to what extent do social media and news reporting exacerbate liquor store thefts in Winnipeg? McMaster Journal of Communication, 13, 41-87.
Merrett, C. (2000). Teaching social justice: Revising geography's neglected tradition. Journal of Geography, 99 (5): 207-218.
Nation, M., Bess, K., Voight, A., Perkins, D. D., & Juarez, P. (2011). Levels of community engagement in youth violence prevention: The role of power in sustaining successful university-community partnerships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(1-2), 89-96.
Ostrander, S. A. (2004). Democracy, civic participation, and the university: A comparative study of civic engagement on five campuses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 74-93.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd. ed.). Teachers College Press.
Spruit, A., Van Vugt, E., van der Put, C., van der Stouwe, T., & Stams, G. J. (2016). Sports participation and juvenile delinquency: A meta-analytic review. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(4), 655-671.
Warr, D., & Williams, R. (2016). Two steps forward, one step back: Achievements and limitations of university-community partnerships in addressing neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 9(1): 22.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. David Michael Telles-Langdon, Dr. Nathan Hall
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.