Leveraging University Capital and In-Kind Resources into Community Partnerships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/27682Keywords:
university partnerships, community engagement, capital, in-kind resources, out-of-school-time education, community-facing programsAbstract
Public universities with campuses positioned in urban, low-income neighborhoods have an opportunity and civic obligation to engage with the K-12 schools, non-profits, and community-based organizations who directly serve their community. However, the lack of centralization of our community-facing work and the need to institutionalize community engagement leave community-engaged administrators and scholars with limited budgets and without formal strategic plans that prioritize the commitment of university resources. This paper presents five types of capital that can be leveraged from universities as in-kind resources to create educational programing for youth from low-income communities. Findings highlight the planning and implementation of three out-of-school time (OST) educational partnership programs alternatively based within a community center, on campus, and in two public schools. A document review and deductive thematic analysis of archival data capturing the in-kind resources from the university during a six-year period found the following types of capital were leveraged: physical, financial, intellectual, human, and social. Findings reveal granular examples of what, where, and how to leverage in-kind campus resources to launch and sustain educational youth programming and the early renderings of a strategic model for establishing inter-organizational alliances with cross-campus units for mutually beneficial outcomes that come from institutionalizing community engagement.
References
Beere, C. A., Votruba, J. C., & Wells, G. W. (2011). Becoming an engaged campus: A practical guide for institutionalizing public engagement. John Wiley & Sons.
Blank, M. J., Jacobson, R., Melaville, A., & Pearson, S. S. (2010). Financing Community Schools: Leveraging Resources to Support Student Success. Coalition for Community Schools. 4455 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 310, Washington, DC 20008.
Bretschneider, P. J., Cirilli, S., Jones, T., Lynch, S., & Wilson, N. A. (2017). Document review as a qualitative research data collection method for teacher research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal. 9(2), 27-40.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2023). The 2024 First Time Documentation Framework.
Cunningham, H. R., & Smith, P. (2020). Community Engagement Plans: A Tool for Institutionalizing Community Engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 24(2), 53-68.
Doberneck, D. M., Glass, C. R., & Schweitzer, J. (2010). From rhetoric to reality: A typology of publically engaged scholarship. Journal of higher education outreach and engagement, 14(4), 5-35.
Dostilio, L. D. (Ed.). (2017). The community engagement professional in higher education: A competency model for an emerging field. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Dostilio, L. D., Ohmer, M. L., McFadden, K., Mathew, S., & Finkelstein, C. (2019). Building Community Capacity via Place-Based Hyperlocal Engagement. (pp. 2–30). Towson, MD: Coalition of Urban and Metropolitan Universities.
Fawcett, S., et. al. (2008). Community Tool Box Curriculum Module 12: Evaluating the initiative. Work Group for Community Health and Development. University of Kansas.
Garton, P. (2021).Types of Anchor Institution Initiatives: An Overview of University Urban Development Literature. Metropolitan Universities, 32(2), 85-105.
Gauntner, J. & Hansman, C. A. (2017) Boundary-Spanner Role Conflict in Public Urban Universities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21 (1),104-131.
Holland, B. (1997). Analyzing institutional commitment to service: A model of key organizational factors. Michigan journal of community service learning, 4(1), 30-41.
Holland, B. A. (2009). Will it last? Evidence of institutionalization at Carnegie classified community engagement institutions. New directions for higher education, 147(Fall), 85-98.
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact.
Kania, J., Williams, J., Schmitz, P., Brady, S., Kramer, M., & Juster, J. S. (2022). Centering equity in collective impact. Stanford social innovation review, 20(1), 38-45.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. sage.
McGeary, M., & Hanna, K. E. (2004). Examples of Leveraging Nonfederal Dollars for Research. In Strategies to Leverage Research Funding: Guiding DOD's Peer Reviewed Medical Research Programs. National Academies Press (US).
O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Stroh, D. P. (2009). Leveraging grantmaking: Understanding the dynamics of complex social systems. The Foundation Review, 1(3), 9.
Stroh, D. P. (2015). Systems thinking for social change: A practical guide to solving complex problems, avoiding unintended consequences, and achieving lasting results. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Swartz, D. (1997) Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632-657.
Wimer, C., Post, M., & Little, P. (2004). Leveraging Resources to Promote Positive School-CBO Relationships. Afterschool Matters, 3, 15-23.
Yamamura, E. K., & Koth, K. (2019). Leadership Practices for Place-Based Community Engagement Initiatives. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 23(1), 181-196.
Yamamura, E. K., & Koth, K. (2018). Place-based community engagement in higher education: A strategy to transform universities and communities. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. Meghan Raisch
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
