The People-Place Dilemma: The Challenge for Anchor Networks in Legacy Cities
The Challenge for Anchor Networks in Legacy Cities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/27454Keywords:
anchor institutions & initiatives, Community-based economic development, Asset-based community development, uneven development, racial and economic segregation, legacy cities, community-engaged researchAbstract
Anchor movements rest on the premise that people- and place-based initiatives can be mutually reinforcing. The community development movement, however, has been haunted for years by the people-place dilemma – the idea that efforts to help people harm efforts to uplift places and vice versa. This article examines the people-place dilemma through a case study of the St. Louis Anchor Action Network (STLAAN), a collaboration of 16 anchor institutions. St. Louis is a classic legacy city that once enjoyed rapid growth but is now characterized by falling population size and high poverty. The heart of the people-place dilemma in legacy cities is that efforts to help people in disinvested communities may enable them to move somewhere else, leaving behind poorer communities. We document longstanding trends that have drained STLAAN’s focus geography of people and resources, as well as more recent growth of an “eds and meds” economy that presents an opportunity to address decades of disinvestment and decline. We examine STLAAN’s efforts to invest in its focus geography and the people who live there, drawing lessons for anchor work, especially in legacy cities. Our research underscores the importance of data, social commitments, community engagement, and research.
References
REFERENCES
Bernhard, B. 2023. St. Louis Archdiocese’s reorganization will close 34 parishes.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, May 28.
Bischoff, K. 2008. “School district fragmentation and racial residential segregation: How do boundaries matter?” Urban Affairs Review 44(2), 182-217.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408320651
Chetty, R., et al, 2022a. Social capital I: Measurement and associations with economic mobility. Nature, Issue 7921, August, 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04996-4
Chetty, R., et al, 2022b. Social capital II: determinants of economic connectedness. Nature, Issue 7921, August, 108-121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04997-3
Chetty, R. and Hendren, R. 2015. The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility: childhood exposure effects and county –level estimates. National Bureau of Economic Research. May Edition. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23002
Curley, A. M. 2010. “Neighborhood institutions, facilities, and public space: A missing
link for Hope VI residents’ development of social capital?” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research. 12(1): 33-63. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1585361
Curley, A. M. 2009. “Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 26(2-3): 227-247.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509106716
Dubb, S., McKinley, S. & Howard, T. 2013. The Anchor Dashboard: Aligning Institutional Practice to Meet Low-Income Community Needs. Takoma Park, MD: The Democracy Collaborative at the University of Maryland.
Ehlenz, M. M. 2016. Neighborhood revitalization and the anchor institution: Assessing the impact of the University of Pennsylvania’s West Philadelphia initiatives on University City. Urban Affairs Review, 52(5), 714-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415601220
Ehlenz, M. M. 2017. Gown, town, and neighborhood change: An examination of urban neighborhoods with university revitalization initiatives. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17739111
Ehrenhalt, Alan. 2012. The Great Inversion and the Future of the American City. New York: Vintage Books.
East-West Gateway Council of Governments. 2015. Where We Stand, 7th Edition; available at: https://www.ewgateway.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/wws2015.pdf.
Garton, P. 2021. Types of anchor institution initiatives: An overview of university urban development literature. Metropolitan Universities, 32 (2), 85-105. https://doi: 10.18060/25242
Goetz, Edward. 2015. Poverty pimping CDCs: The search for dispersal’s next bogeyman, Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 25, No. 3, 608-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2015.1035012
Gordon, Colin. 2008. Mapping Decline: St. Louis and the Fate of the American City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Heikil, Eric J. 1996. “Are municipalities Tieboutian clubs?” Regional Science and Urban Economics 26, 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02112-4
Hochschild, Jennifer, Vesla Weaver, and Traci Burch. 2012. Creating a New Racial Order: How Immigration, Multiracialism, Genomics, and the Young Can Remake Race in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/668540
Kain, John F. and Joseph J. Persky. 1969. Alternatives to the gilded ghetto. Public Interest, January, 74-87.
Krysan, Maria and Kyle Crowder. 2017. Cycle of Segregation: Social Processes and Residential
Stratification. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
Lichter, Daniel T., Domenico Parisi, and Michael C. Taquino. 2017. “Together but apart: Do Whites live in racially diverse cities and neighborhoods?” Population and Development Review 43 (2): 229-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12068
Logan, J. R. and Molotch, H. L. 2007. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Logan, J R., Xu, Z, & Stults, B. 2014. Interpolating US Decennial Census Tract Data from as Early as 1970 to 2010: A Longitudinal Tract Database. The Professional Geographer 66(3): 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.905156
Logan, J. R. and Stults, B. 2021. The Persistence of Segregation in the Metropolis: New Findings from the 2020 Census, Diversity and Disparities Project, Brown University, https://s4.ad.brown.edu/Projects/Diversity.
Mallach, A. 2015. “The Uncoupling of the Economic City: Increasing Spatial and Economic Polarization in American Older Industrial Cities.” Urban Affairs Review 51 (4): 443-473.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414537609
Mallach, A. 2020. “Over the edge: Trajectories of African-American middle neighborhoods in St. Louis since 2000.” Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(1): 1-23. DOI:10.1080/07352166.2019.1607747
Mallach. A. & Swanstrom, T. 2023. The Changing American Neighborhood: The Meaning of Place in the Twenty-First Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2023.
Melamed, S. 2018. The Penn Alexander effect: Is there any room left of low-income residents in University City? Philadelphia Inquirer, November 1.
Orfield, M., et al. 2015. High costs and segregation in subsidized housing policy, Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 25, No. 2, 574-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2014.963641
Porter, J., D. Fisher-Bruns, D. & Pham, B. H. 2019. Anchor Collaboratives: Building Bridges With Place-based Partnerships and Anchor Institutions. The Democracy Collaborative
Rothwell, J. and Massey, D. 2010. “Density zoning and class segregation in U. S. metropolitan areas,” Social Science Quarterly 91, pp. 1123-1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00724.x
Sampson, Robert J. 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sharkey, Patrick. 2013. Stuck in Place: Urban Neighborhoods and the End of Progress toward Racial Equity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Skobba, K. & Goetz, E. 2013. “Mobility decisions of very low-income households.” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research. 15(2): 155-171.
St. Louis Community Credit Union. 2022. Community Impact Deposit Program Impact Report 2022. St. Louis, MO: St. Louis Community Credit Union.
Swanstrom, T., Webber, H & Metzger, M. 2017. Rebound neighborhoods in older industrial cities. In Economic Mobility: Research & Ideas on Strengthening Families, Communities & the Economy, Edited by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 325-352.
Swanstrom, T., Guenther, K. & George, T. Pursuing the anchor mission in a fragmented suburban setting: Assets, capacity, and collective action,” Metropolitan Universities 30(4), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.18060/23364
Swanstrom, T. & Ploger, J. 2022. What to make of gentrification in older industrial cities: Comparing St. Louis (USA) and Dortmund (Germany), Urban Affairs Review Vol. 58 (2), 526-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087420975203
Walker, L. A. & East, J. F. 2018. The roles of foundations and universities in redevelopment planning. Metropolitan Universities, 29(2), 33 – 56. https://doi.org/10.18060/22342
Webber. H. S. and Karlstrom, M. 2009. Why community investment is good for nonprofit anchor institutions: Understanding costs, benefits, and the range of strategic options. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
Weiher, G.. 1991. The Fractured Metropolis: Political Fragmentation and Metropolitan Segregation, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Woldoff, R. A. 2002. “The effects of local stressors on neighborhood attachment.”
Social Forces. 81(1): 87-116. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0065
Zahnow, R. & Tsai, A. 2021. “Crime victimization, place attachment, and the moderating role of neighborhood social ties and neighboring behavior.” Environment and Behavior. 53(1), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519875175
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Todd Swanstrom, Ifeanyi Ukpabi, Elaina Johns-Wolfe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
