Enhancing Student Commitment to the Micro-Mezzo-Macro Continuum
The Macro Practice Assignment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/25577Keywords:
human trafficking, teaching in social work, macro practice, human trafficking education, social work educationAbstract
Despite the importance of macro practice to the social work profession, research related to social work students’ preparation and enthusiasm for macro practice suggests that there is significant room for improvement within macro social work education. The purpose of this report is to describe and explore a novel macro social work pedagogy that is designed to encourage student engagement within macro practice social work courses. The Macro Practice Assignment (MPA) offers students a real-world learning exercise with embedded micro, mezzo, and macro social work applications with one vulnerable population. The results of a multiple case study exploring the effectiveness of the MPA reveals that the MPA 1) reduces students’ negative perceptions of macro practice courses and careers, 2) fosters students’ interest in future macro practice, and 3) helps students see macro practice as a necessary component of the micro-mezzo-macro practice continuum. In order to address shortcomings in macro social work education, educators should consider adding real-world macro practice learning exercises such as the MPA, grounded in Bloom’s Taxonomy, with the goal of enhancing social workers’ lifelong commitment to macro practice.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. Longman.
Anderson, L. W., & Sosniak, L. A. (1994). Bloom’s Taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. 2. University of Chicago Press.
Austin, M. J. (2019). Pathways for promoting macro practice in social work education: A commentary. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 43(4), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2019.1666764
Austin, M. J., Anthony, E. K., Knee, R. T., & Mathias, J. (2016). Revisiting the relationship between micro and macro social work practice. Families in Society, 97(4), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2016.97.33
Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy and educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. Longman.
Council on Social Work Education. (2022). Educational policy and accreditation standards. https://www.cswe.org/getmedia/94471c42-13b8-493b-9041-b30f48533d64/2022-EPAS.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in Conducting a Scholarly Mixed Methods Study. DBER Speaker Series. 48. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dberspeakers/48
Crutchfield, R. M., Funge, S., & Jennings, L. (2016). Beginning to see the big picture: BSW student reflections on community macro practice. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 21(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.18084/1084-7219.21.1.79.
Deal, K. H., Hopkins, K. M., Fisher, L., & Hartin, J. (2007). Field practicum experiences of macro-oriented graduate students: Are we doing them justice? Administration in Social Work, 31(4), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v31n04_05
Plitt Donaldson, L., Fogel, S., Hill, K., Erickson, C., & Ferguson, S. (2016). Attitudes toward advanced licensing for macro social work practice. Journal of Community Practice, 24(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2015.1127864
Ezell, M., Chernesky, R. H., & Healy, L. M. (2004). The learning climate for administration students. Administration in Social Work, 28(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v28n01_05
Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Conference paper. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1064378/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Hill, K. M., Erickson, C. L., Donaldson, L. P., Fogel, S. J., & Ferguson, S. M. (2017). Perceptions of macro social work education: An exploratory study of educators and practitioners. Advances in Social Work, 18(2), 522-542. https://doi.org/10.18060/21455
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Iverson, M., Dentato, M. P., Green, K., & Busch, N. (2021). The continued need for macro field internships: Support, visibility and quality matter. Journal of Social Work Education, 57(3), 478-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1671265
Liddell, J. L., & Lass, K. (2019). Where’s the community practice? Gaps in community practice education in a clinical-community social work program. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 39(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2018.1548408
Lucero, J. L., Evers, J., Roark, J., & Parker, D. (2017). Using community-based research to improve BSW students’ learning in community practice: Bringing the macro into focus for traditional and distance learners. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 37(3), 260-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2017.1320621
McBeath, B. (2016). Re-envisioning macro social work practice. Families in Society, 97(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2016.97.9
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Code of ethics. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Netting, F. E. (2005). The future of macro social work. Advances in Social Work, 6(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.18060/78
Pritzker, S., & Applewhite, S. R. (2015). Going “macro”: Exploring the careers of macro practitioners. Social Work, 60(3), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swv019
Reisch, M. (2017). Why macro practice matters. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(1), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1179537
Rothman, J. (2013). Education for macro intervention: A survey of problems and prospects. https://swhelper.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ACOSA+Report-by+Dr.+Rothman.pdf
Rothman, J., & Mizrahi, T. (2014). Balancing micro and macro practice: A challenge for social work. Social Work, 59(1), 91-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swt067
Salsberg, E., Quigley, L., Richwine, C., Sliwa, S., Acquaviva, K., & Wyche, K. (2019). From social work education to social work practice: Results of the survey of 2018 sociql work graduates. George Washington University Health Workforce Institute. https://www.socialworkers.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=eLsquD1s2qI%3d&portalid=0
Williams-Gray, B. (2014). Preparation for social service leadership: Fieldwork and virtual organizations that promote critical thinking in administration practice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2014.892050
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
Zach, L. (2006). Using a multiple-case studies design to investigate the information-seeking behavior of arts administrators. Library Trends, 55(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0055
Zerden, L. D. S., Sheely, A., & Despard, M. R. (2016). Debunking macro myths: Findings from recent graduates about jobs, salaries, and skills. Social Work Education, 35(7), 752-766. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1188915
Zippay, A., & Demone, H. (2011). Initial macro-level job responsibilities among MSW graduates. Administration in Social Work, 35(4), 412-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/03643107.2011.599301
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mary Twis, Don Greenwood, Morgan Files
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.