Constructing the Future of Social Work Tech Habits of Mind With the Ethical OS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/24978Keywords:
Ethical OS, Social Work Futures, social work technology, structural racism, habits of mindAbstract
Technological innovation has long been seen as a hallmark of progress in the modern world. While these advances may facilitate advantages to individual and social well-being, they have the potential for creating new areas of risk and expanding on those that already exist. In addition, a global pandemic has reshaped how we interact with one another, as more people connect online. Social work’s ongoing relationship with technology necessitates that we evaluate and re-envision how tech ethics create, shape, and transform social work practice. This paper has three goals. First, we argue that technologies have long been a hidden driver of social work practice and provide an initial mapping of their current influence. Second, we introduce the Ethical OS as a tool for conceptualizing ethical issues that may arise in social work practice, education, and policy. We ask if this tool could promote seeing around corners regarding how developing technologies might be advantageous or disadvantageous for reference or consumer groups. For example, how do they reify historical injustices such as structural racism and how do they offer remediation? Third, we discuss the importance of building coherent, social work tech habits of mind, in practice now and for the future
References
American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare. (2021). Progress and plans for the grand challenges: An impact report at year 5 of the 10-year initiative. https://view.pagetiger.com/grand-challenges-impact-report-2021
Armstrong, P. B. (2020). Stories and the brain: The neuroscience of narrative. JHU Press.
Baker, L. R., & Hitchcock, L. I. (2017). Using Pinterest in undergraduate social work education: Assignment development and pilot survey results. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(3), 535-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1272515
Belluomini, E. (2013). Technology changing the face of social work. The New Social Worker, 20(2), 26-27. Retrieved from https://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/technology-articles/Technology_Changing_the_Face_of_Social_Work/
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Crow. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162
Berzin, S. C., Singer, J., & Chan, C. (2015). Practice innovation through technology in the digital age: A grand challenge for social work. American Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare, 12, 3-21.
Bietti, E. (2020, January). From ethics washing to ethics bashing: A view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 210-219). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914119
Boddy, J., & Dominelli, L. (2017). Social media and social work: The challenges of a new ethical space. Australian Social Work, 70(2), 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2016.1224907
Brady, S. R., Young, J. A., & McLeod, D. A. (2015). Utilizing digital advocacy in community organizing: Lessons learned from organizing in virtual spaces to promote worker rights and economic justice. Journal of Community Practice, 23(2), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2015.1027803
Campbell, J. (2006). Theorising habits of mind as a framework for learning. Computer and Mathematics Science, 6(1), 102-109.
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (Eds.). (2008). Learning and leading with habits of mind: 16 essential characteristics for success. ASCD.
Council on Social Work Education [CSWE]. (2018). Envisioning the future of social work: Report of the CSWE Futures Task Force. https://sites.tuni.fi/uploads/2020/05/4585afae-artikkeli-sosionomi-yamk-valintakoe-2020.pdf
Ethical OS. (2021, July 15). Ethical OS: A guide to anticipating the future impact of today’s technology. Or: How not to regret the things you will build. https://ethicalos.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Ethical-OS-Toolkit.pdf
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.
Gangadharan, S. P., & Niklas, J. (2019). Decentering technology in discourse on discrimination. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 882–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1593484
Gasser, U., Ienca, M., Schreibner, J., Sleigh, J., & Vayena, E. (2020). Digital tools against Covid-19: Taxonomy, ethical challenges and navigational aid. Lancet Digital Health, 2, e425-e434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30137-0
Goldkind, L., Wolf, L., & Freddolino, P. P. (Eds.). (2019). Digital social work: Tools for practice with individuals, organizations, and communities. Oxford University Press.
Hao, K. (2021). Inside the fight to reclaim AI from big tech’s control. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/06/14/1026148/ai-big-tech-timnit-gebru-paper-ethics/
Helsper, E. J. (2021). The digital disconnect: The social causes and consequences of digital inequalities. Sage Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526492982
Hitchcock, L. I., & Young, J. A. (2016). Tweet tweet! Using live Twitter chats in social work education. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 35(4), 457-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1136273
Hitchcock, L. I., Sage, M., & Smyth, N. J. (Eds.). (2018). Technology in social work education: Educators’ perspectives on the NASW technology standards for social work education and supervision. University at Buffalo School of Social Work. https://socialwork.buffalo.edu/content/dam/socialwork/home/resource-center/technology-in-social-work-education-booklet.pdf
Institute for the Future & Omidyar Network. (2018). Ethical OS toolkit. Retrieved from https://ethicalos.org/.
Kimball, E., & Kim, J. (2013). Virtual boundaries: Ethical considerations for the use of social media in social work. Social Work, 58, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swt005
Kline, A., & Dolamore, S. (2020). Understanding data-driven organizational culture: A case study of Family League of Baltimore. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 38(3), 247-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2018.1564412
Krueger, L. W. & Stretch, J. J. (2000). How hypermodern technology in social work education bites back. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(1), 103–114.
LaMendola, W. (2010). Social work and social presence in an online world. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28(1-2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228831003759562
Lee, E., Kourgiantakis, T., & Bogo, M. (2020). Translating knowledge into practice: Using simulation to enhance mental health competence through social work education. Social Work Education, 39(3), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1620723
Lilley, M., Currie, A., Pyper, A., & Attwood, S. (2020). Using the Ethical OS toolkit to mitigate the risk of unintended consequences. International Conference on Human-Computer Interactions, Conference Paper. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_10
McNutt, J. G., & Menon, G. M. (2008). The rise of cyberactivism: Implications for the future of advocacy in the human services. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 89(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1606%2F1044-3894.3706
Metcalf, J., Moss, E., & Boyd, D. (2019). Owning ethics: Corporate logics, Silicon Valley, and the institutionalization of ethics. Social Research, 86(2), 449-473. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2019.0022
Mishna, F., Bogo, M., Root, J., Sawyer, J. L., & Khoury-Kassabri, M. (2012). “It just crept in”: The digital age and implications for social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(3), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0383-4
Nason, E. E., Trahan, M., Smith, S., Metsis, V., & Selber, K. (2020). Virtual treatment for veteran social anxiety disorder: A comparison of 360 video and 3D virtual reality. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 38(3), 288-308.
National Association of Social Workers [NASW]. (2021). NASW code of ethics. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
NASW, Association of Social Work Boards, CSWE, and Clinical Social Work Association. (2017). NASW, ASWB, CSWE, and CSWA standards for technology in social work practice. https://www.socialworkers.org/includes/newIncludes/homepage/PRA-BRO-33617.TechStandards_FINAL_POSTING.pdf
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5
Omidyar Network. (2018). Introducing the (World’s first) ethical operating system: A toolkit for anticipating future risk and building a better tech ecosystem. https://medium.com/omidyar-network/introducing-the-worlds-first-ethical-operating-system-7acc4abc2bfa
O'Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Press.
Pardes, A. (August 7, 2018) Silicon Valley writes a playbook to help avert ethical disasters. WIRED [Magazine Publication]. https://www.wired.com/story/ethical-os/
Parrott, L., & Madoc-Jones, I. (2008). Reclaiming information and communication technologies for empowering social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017307084739
Perron, B. E., Taylor, H. O., Glass, J. E., & Margerum-Leys, J. (2010). Information and communication technologies in social work. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.18060/241
Reamer, F. G. (2014). The evolution of social work ethics: Bearing witness. Advances in Social Work, 15(1), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.18060/14637
Reamer, F. G. (2018). Ethical standards for social workers' use of technology: Emerging consensus. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 15(2), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.7312/ream18828
Reamer, F. G. (2021). Ethical issues in social work and technology. Oxford University Press.
Sage, M., Wells, M., Sage, T., & Devlin, M. (2017). Supervisor and policy roles in social media use as a new technology in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 78, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.04.018
Schoech, D. (2013). Community practice in the digital age. In M. Weil, M. Reisch, & M. L. Ohmer (Eds.), The handbook of community practice (pp. 809-826). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976640.n39
Schoech, D., Fitch, D., MacFadden, R., & Schkade, L. L. (2002). From data to intelligence. Administration in Social, 26(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v26n01_01
Sitter, K. C. & Curnew, A. H. (2016). The application of social media in social work community practice, Social Work Education, 35(3), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1131257
Walter-McCabe, H. (2020). Coronavirus pandemic calls for immediate social work response. Social Work in Public Health, 35(3), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2020.1751533
Watson, S. (2019). Industry efforts aren’t about to disrupt tech’s ethics problems. https://cyber.harvard.edu/story/2019-04/industry-efforts-arent-about-disrupt-techs-ethics-problem
Wilkerson, D. A., Wolfe-Taylor, S. N., Deck, C. K., Wahler, E. A., & Davis, T. S. (2020). Telebehavioral practice basics for social worker educators and clinicians responding to COVID-19. Social Work Education, 39(8), 1137-1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1807926
York, R. (2008). Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work program. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700031
Young, J. A., & Glennon, A. (2021). Social media in social work: Research, education, and practice. In D. A. González, A. A. Astray & A. A. Puelles (Eds.), Social work in digital societies (pp. 95-113). McGraw-Hill.
Young, J. A., McLeod, D. A., & Brady, S. R. (2018). The ethics challenge: 21st century social work education, social media, and digital literacies. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 15(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.7312/ream18828-002
Young, J. A., & Ronquillo, R. (2022). Enhancing new media literacies of social work students through a participatory learning environment. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 40(1), 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2021.2004572
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tonya Bibbs, Samantha Wolfe-Taylor, Nicole Alston, Mackenzie Barron, Lillian Beaudoin, Samuel Bradley, Alexis Glennon, Julie Munoz Munoz-Najar, Laura Nissen, Juan Rios, Hannah Szlyk, Anjanette Wells, Jaehee Yi, Jimmy Young
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.