Revising McPhail’s Feminist Policy Analysis Framework
Updates for Use in Contemporary Social Policy Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/22639Keywords:
feminist, policy, policy analysis, intersectionality, social workAbstract
In 2003, McPhail published a Feminist Policy Analysis Framework concluding that the many available methods of policy analysis across disciplines, including social work, treated policies as gender-neutral compositions. McPhail (2003) asserted that these methods denied the many ways that institutions and policies of society are organized by the concepts of gender, therefore presenting incomplete products of analysis. This guiding purpose for the development of McPhail’s (2003) Feminist Policy Analysis Framework endures a full fifteen years later. In the years since publication of McPhail’s Framework, advancements have been made in both feminist theory and in policy analysis methods. This conceptual article outlines a much-needed revision moving the framework into a contemporary position with the inclusion of a focus on privilege, oppression, and intersectionality. The revised framework presented herein is a more conceptually comprehensive and practical model for use by all, but particularly social work students and scholars. The revised model represents an update rendering it more effective in today’s polarized political climate as well as with the recently revised social work educational policy (Council on Social Work Education, 2015). A revised framework of Feminist Intersectional Policy Analysis is presented, including guiding questions and conceptual complexities to consider in the work of analysis.
References
Amin, M., MacLachlan, M., Mannan, H., El Tayeb, S., El Khatim, A., Swartz, L., … Schneider, M. (2011). Equiframe: A framework for analysis of the inclusion of human rights and vulnerable groups in health policies. Health & Human Rights: An International Journal, 13(2), 1-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035864
Andersen, M. L., & Collins, P. H. (Eds.). (2004). Race, class, and gender: An anthology (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson/Wadsworth.
Baldwin, B. (2015). Backsliding: The United States Supreme Court, Shelby County v. Holder and the dismantling of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Berkeley Journal of African American Law and Policy, 16(2), 251-262. doi: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38KS5P
Bastia, T. (2014). Intersectionality, migration and development. Progress in Development Studies, 14(3), 237-248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1464993414521330
Breitkreuz, R. S. (2005). Engendering citizenship? A critical feminist analysis of Canadian welfare-to-work policies and the employment experiences of lone mothers. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 32(2), 147-165.
Butler, J. (1998). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “Postmodernism.” Cadernos Pagu, 11, 11-42.
Carastathis, A. (2014). The concept of intersectionality in feminist theory. Philosophy Compass, 9/5, 304-314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12129
Carbado, D. W., Crenshaw, K. W., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 303-312.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000349
Cingano, F. (2014). Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 163).
doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjncwxv6j-en
Corus, C., Saatcioglu, B., Kaufman-Scarborough, C., Blocker, C. P., Upadhyaya, S., & Appau, S. (2016). Transforming Poverty-Related Policy with Intersectionality. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 35(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.15.141
Council on Social Work Education. (2015). 2015 educational policy and accreditation standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Accreditation-Process/2015-EPAS/2015EPAS_Web_FINAL.pdf.aspx
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist policies. University of Chicago Law Forum, 139-167.
doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500480-5
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Dill, B. T., & Zambrana, R. E. (Eds.). (2009). Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
DiNitto, D. M. (2016). Social welfare: Politics and public policy (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Dunn, W. N. (1994). Public policy analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2012). Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. NY: Routledge.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. NY: Seabury Press.
Frye, M. (1983). The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press.
Gilbert, N., & Terrell, P. (2013). Dimensions of social welfare policy (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Gill, D. G. (1998). Confronting injustice and oppression: Concepts and strategies for social workers. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gordon, L. (1994). Pitied but not entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare, 1890-1935. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
Hankivsky, O. (2012). An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework. Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.
Hankivsky, O. (2018). Gender-based analysis plus in Canada: Problems and possibilities of integrating intersectionality. Canadian Public Policy, 44(4), 303-316.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2017-058
Hankivsky, O., & Cormier, R. (2011). Intersectionality and public policy: Some lessons from existing models. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 217-229.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910376385
Hankivsky, O., Grace, D., Hunting, G., Giesbrecht, M., Fridkin, A., Rudrum, S., … Clark, N. (2014). An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: Critical reflections on a methodology for advancing equity. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0119-x
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Harding, S. G. (1998). Is science multicultural? postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Hawkesworth, M. (1994). Policy studies within a feminist frame. Policy Sciences, 27(2-3), 97-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999883
Hawkesworth, M., & Disch, L. J. (2016). The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.1
hooks, b. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
hooks, b. (2012). Writing beyond race: Living theory and practice. London, UK: Routledge.
Hyde, C. (2000). Feminist approaches to social policy. In J. Midgley, M. Tracey, & M. Livermore (Eds.), The handbook of social policy (pp. 421-435). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jansson, B. S. (2003). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
Johnson, A. G. (2006). Privilege, power, and difference (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Jordan, J. (2006). Mothers, wives, and workers: Explaining gendered dimensions of the welfare state. Comparative Political Studies, 39(9), 1109-1132.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005284215
Karger, H. J., & Stoesz, D. (2014). American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Levitt, J. (2017). Quick and dirty: The new misreading of the Voting Rights Act. Florida State University Law Review, 43(2), 573-610. Retrieved from https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol43/iss2/7
Mansfield, K. C., Welton, A. D., & Grogan, M. (2014). “Truth or consequences”: A feminist critical policy analysis of the STEM crisis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1155-1182.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.916006
Marecek, J. (2016). Invited reflection: Intersectionality theory and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 177-181. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361684316641090
Marshall, C. (1999). Researching the margins: Feminist critical policy analysis. Educational Policy, 13(1), 59-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904899131006
Matsuda, M. J. (1987). Looking to the bottom: Critical legal studies and reparations. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22, 323-399.
McPhail, B. A. (2003). A feminist policy analysis framework: Through a gendered lens. Social Policy Journal, 2(2-3), 39-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J185v02n02_04
Midgley, J., Tracey, M., & Livermore, M. (Eds.). (2000). The handbook of social policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Movement Advancement Project & GLADD. (2011). An ally’s guide to talking about transgender-inclusive non-discrimination laws. Boulder, CO: Author. Retrieved from http://www.lgbtmap.org/file/allys-guide-talking-about-trans-inclusive-ndos.pdf
Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1-15.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4
National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
New Oxford American Dictionary. (2001). Gendered. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Ore, T. E. (2006). The social construction of difference and inequality: Race, class, gender and sexuality (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Ore, T. E. (2018). The social construction of difference and inequality: Race, class, gender, and sexuality (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Oxford University Press.
Pascall, G. (1997). Social policy: A new feminist analysis. London: Routledge.
Pearson, R., & Jackson, C. (2000). Interrogating development: Feminism, gender and policy. In C. Jackson & R. Pearson (Eds.), Feminist visions of development: Gender analysis and policy (pp. 1-16). NY: Routledge.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00397_1.x
Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2006). Contemporary human behavior theory: A critical perspective for social work (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Sainsbury, D. (1999). Gender and welfare state regimes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sapiro, V. (1990). The gendered basis of American social policy. In L. Gordon (Ed.), Women, the state, and welfare (pp. 36-54). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Shaw, K. M. (2004). Using feminist critical policy analysis in the realm of higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 75(1), 56-79.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11778896
Turner, J. H., Singleton Jr., R. S., & Musick, D. (1987). Oppression: A socio-history of Black-white relations in America. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/30.5.461
van Wormer, K. (2004). Confronting oppression, restoring justice: From policy analysis to social action. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl096
World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance. (2001). NGO forum declaration. NY: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/WCAR/durban.pdf
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752
