Analyzing Social Policy from a Network Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/22631Keywords:
Networked governance, network analysis, policy implementation, policy processAbstract
Governance models influence the approach that public service organizations take when implementing programs, policies, and practices. The networked model of governance supports the involvement of multiple actors who span organizational boundaries and roles to implement solutions to address complex social problems. This paper presents the utility of network analysis for the study of policy implementation from a network perspective. The paper describes networks within the context of social work policy implementation, basic network components, common structural variables, and sources of data for the study of policy implementation. A study of a statewide policy implementation is partially presented as an illustration of the use of network analysis in social policy research. The illustration uses primary and secondary data with network analysis techniques to identify and describe the patterns of interactions that comprise the structure of the implementation network. The illustration will present examples of the study findings to demonstrate the utility of network analysis in identifying central network actors and describing the density of the network according to different network variables. The paper concludes with a summary of the utility of network analysis in the study of policy implementation with recommendations for future research.
References
Agranoff, R. (2014). Local governments in multilevel systems” Emergent public administration challenges. American Review of Public Administration, 44(4S), 48S-62S. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013497629
Agranoff, R. (2017). Crossing boundaries for intergovernmental management. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). After the network is formed: Process, power, and performance. In M. Mandell (Ed.), Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management (pp. 11-29). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199606412.001.0001
Birkland, T. (2001). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
Borgatti, S. P. (2018, February 24). mgt 780 centrality 1 [video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKM0f9QzlhU
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. (2011). Analyzing affiliation networks. In J. Scott & P. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 417-433). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Contractor, N., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytical framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681-701.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318925
Goggin, M. (1986). The “too few cases/too many variables” problem in implementation research. The Western Political Quarterly, 39(2), 328-347.
doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/448302
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Hall, T., & O’Toole, L. (2000). Structures for policy implementation: An analysis of national legislation, 1965-1966 and 1993-1994. Administration & Society, 31(6), 667-686. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019281
Kapucu, N., Hu, Q., & Khosa, S. (2017). The state of network research in public administration. Administration & Society, 49(8), 1087-1120.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714555752
Klaster, E., Wilderom, C., & Muntslag, D. (2017). Balancing relations and results in regional networks of public-policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 27(4), 676-691.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux015
Klign, E., & Koppenjan, J. (2012). Governance network theory: Past, present and future. Policy & Politics, 40(4), 587-606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655431
Knoke, D. (2011). Policy networks. In Scott, J., & Carrington, P. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (p. 210-222). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Kolpakov, A., Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2016). Understanding interoperability in collaborative network management: The case of Metro High School. Journal of Health Science, 4, 318-332.
Lane, S., & Pritzker, S. (2018). Political social work: Using power to create social change. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68588-5
Lecy, J., Mergel, I., & Schmitz, H. (2014). Networks in public administration. Public Management Review, 16(5), 643-665.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.743577
Marsden, P. (2011). Survey methods for network data. In J. Scott & P. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 340-369). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Milward, H., Provan, K., Fish, A., Isett, K., & Huang, K. (2010). Governance and collaboration: An evolutionary study of two mental health networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 20(supp. 1), i125-i141.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup038
Mischen, P., & Jackson, S. (2008). Connecting the dots: Applying complexity theory, knowledge management and social network analysis to policy implementation. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 314-338.
Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mulvaney, K. K., Lee, S., Hook, T. O., & Prokopy, L. S. (2015). Casting a net to better understand fisheries management: An affiliation network analysis of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission. Marine Policy, 57, 120-131.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.008
Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996368
Or, N., & Aranda-Jan, A. (2017). The dynamic role of state and nonstate actors: Governance after global financial crisis. Policy Studies Journal, 45(S1), S67-S81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12201
O’Toole, L. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45-52.
doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/976691
O’Toole, L. (2014). Networks and networking: The public administrative agendas. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 361-371.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12281
Peters, G. (2011). Governance, Administration, Policies. In D. Berg-Schlosser, B. Badie, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International encyclopedia of political science, Volume 1-8. Los Angeles, CA: Sage [EBook, EBSCO Publishing. Retrieved via University of Nevada Reno]. doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959636.n231
Pierre, J. (2011). Governance. In D. Berg-Schlosser, B. Badie, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International encyclopedia of political science, Volume 1-8. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959636.n230
Provan, K., Huang, K., & Milward, B. (2009). The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 19(4), 873-893. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun036
Provan, K., Veazie, M., Staten, L., & Teufel-Shone, N. (2005). The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 603-613. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00487.x
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Policy Studies, XLIV, 652-667. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
The New York Times. (1933, April 3). Emotions mapped by new geography. Retrieved January 2, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/1933/04/03/archives/emotions-mapped-by-new-geography-charts-seek-to-portray-the.html
Ward, M., Stovel, K., & Sacks, A. (2011). Network analysis and political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 245-264.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.115949
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Weber, E., & Khademian, A. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334-349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
Weible, C., & Sabatier, P. (Eds.). (2018). Theories of the policy process (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284
Yang, S., Keller, F., & Zheng, L. (2017). Social network analysis: Methods and examples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
