Evaluation of Contraception Access within the Indianapolis Metropolitan Area

Authors

  • Grace Yedlicka Indiana University School of Medicine
  • Emily Theis Indiana University School of Medicine
  • Caitlin Bernard Indiana University School of Medicine
  • Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds Indiana University School of Medicine
  • Jeffrey Peipert Indiana University School of Medicine
  • Tracey Wilkinson Indiana University School of Medicine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18060/24804

Abstract

Background: Access to family planning care and the full-spectrum of contraception, including same-day access to long acting reversible contraception (LARC) is critical to reduce unintended pregnancy and maternal/infant mortality. However, access remains variable for many women in Indiana. We sought to examine access to various contraceptive practices within the Indianapolis metropolitan area. 

 

Methods: A telephone survey of clinic managers was conducted between June-July 2020 of all identified IU Health, Eskenazi, and HealthNet primary care and OB/GYN providers in the Indianapolis metropolitan area. The 27-question survey gathered information regarding contraceptive practices (e.g. contraceptive method availability, same-day LARC insertion/removal, pregnancy intention screening, educational materials, and parental consent policies). The data was compared based on type of medical provider (OB/GYN, Family Medicine, and Pediatrics).  

 

Results: In total, 82 sites were identified, 58 surveys (70.7%) were completed. Oral contraception is the most commonly offered contraception (91.4%), followed by depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injection (84.5%), and the contraceptive patch (81.0%). LARC placement is available in 51.7% of all clinics, but only 34.5% offer same-day placements. Routine pregnancy intention screening is offered in 43.1% and educational materials in 74.1% of practices. OB/GYN clinics provide the most comprehensive access, 69.2% provide same-day LARC insertion (84.6% LARC removals). Family medicine practices are variable regarding contraceptive choices: over 91% offer oral contraception and DMPA injections, but only 20.8% place LARCs and 41.7% remove LARCs. Half (50%) of pediatric clinics provide oral contraception, while 50% do not provide any contraceptives. Parental consent for minors to obtain contraception provision is highly variable.  

 

Conclusion: Contraceptive practices vary among primary care and OB/GYN providers in the Indianapolis area. This variability in access leads to barriers for use, particularly for young women. Efforts to ensure comprehensive, same-day access to all forms of contraception (including LARCs), pregnancy intention screening, and contraceptive educational materials are needed.  

Author Biographies

Emily Theis, Indiana University School of Medicine

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Caitlin Bernard, Indiana University School of Medicine

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds, Indiana University School of Medicine

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Jeffrey Peipert, Indiana University School of Medicine

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Tracey Wilkinson, Indiana University School of Medicine

Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Health Services Research

Downloads

Published

2020-12-15

Issue

Section

Abstracts